Susan Kokinda discusses President Trump’s recent national security strategy, which marks a significant departure from over a century of British-influenced American foreign policy.
Susan delves into the geopolitical friction between the U.S. and the UK, particularly regarding their strategies toward Russia and Ukraine.
She underscores the broader clash of worldviews between American sovereignty and British-led internationalism, highlighting the latest developments, including reactions from Russia and European elites.
Also, Susan examines the opposition Trump faces from both within the U.S. political establishment and British geopolitical strategists.
She emphasizes the importance of maintaining political support to ensure the success of Trump’s transformative policies.
Chapters
00:00 The Midweek Update - Trump EXPOSES Britain: The Secret Plot to Block Ukraine Peace - December 10, 2025
02:13 Trump vs. The Crown: Two Incompatible Worldviews
07:02 Russia’s Verdict: ‘Trump Gets It’
08:38 The 2028 Trap: Targeting Vance
Snapshots and Notes
Notes are from the video and contain decades of research by Barbara Boyd and Sus Kokinda, with occasional insertions of Our Notes providing additional information from our 15 years of research and study.
Yesterday (Tue 09 Dec), President Trump shared this with Politico concerning the Ukraine peace deal…
HOWEVER… right after meeting with Kier Starmer at 10 Downing Street, Zelensky threw up another roadblock, rejecting major parts of the peace deal, just as he did with Boris Johnson in 2022…
The sudden change of direction manipulated by the British Empire Elites came after Trump’s National Security Strategy (NSS) was announced last Friday (05 Dec), which placed notice to all global nations that the America First policy would be implemented at all levels, essentially blocking out any of the elites from getting any assistance from and/or manipulation of the U.S.A. So they are now waving their victim card in the media…
Trump vs. The Crown: Two Incompatible Worldviews (02:13)
Click the images to download the PDF (opens in our online library)…
Comparison of each exposes the entire worldview each represents…
NATO expansion into Russia…
Starmer champions internationalism…
While President Trump champions nationalism…
Two incompatible world views.
OUR NOTE:
Remember WHY and WHO started the Cold War - and what bags of goods we were sold for its existence…
On March 5, 1946, Winston Churchill delivered his “Iron Curtain” speech at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri, urging the UK and US to remain strong against the Soviet threat, which is often seen as defining the beginning of the Cold War.
In the speech, Churchill warned of a division in Europe caused by the Soviet Union’s expanding influence, using the phrase “From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the continent.”
He emphasized the necessity for the United States and Britain to act as guardians of peace and stability against the threat of Soviet communism.
This speech also coined the term “special relationship” to describe the alliance between the United States and Great Britain.
Upon becoming Prime Minister again in 1951, Churchill devoted much of his energy to Cold War issues, supporting British participation in United Nations forces during the Korean War.
His strategy aimed to maintain Britain’s global role and establish constructive relations with Moscow through summit conferences.
The rift between Britain and Russia was fed by the discovery of the Cambridge Five, a spy ring that leaked British intelligence secrets to the USSR during and after World War II, impacting Britain’s foreign policy and nuclear deterrent development.
The designation “Cambridge Five” is an invention of the British Media, and the Soviets never referred to them as such because they did not operate as a single spy ring.
In truth, there were thousands of Soviet spies in Britain, suggesting the Cambridge Five were not unique or a particularly focused group.
The Cambridge Five is viewed as a highly damaging and successful spy ring whose activities enabled the Soviets to capture and execute many opponents and British agents.
The saga is frequently cited as the worst intelligence disaster in British history, and the group is said to have achieved near-mythical status in the history of espionage.
All of this has led to today’s relationship between Britain and Europe (due to the relationships among the Royal families throughout Europe), and why the relationship between the USA and Russia has always been more amicable.
Since WWII, the British have relied upon the United States to be the global enforcer for the rules-based order they have kept in place, thanks to American neocons, and then the entire British Empire System, dominated by the British Elites (City of London), is going to collapse.
Susan Kokinda…
And the entire British (National Security Strategy 2025) document is an exercise in the failed policy of the entire post-Cold War period, which the Trump strategy denounces, saying, after the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country.
The idea where the United States is the dumb giant for British imperial policies was perpetuated by American neocons, by people like Tony Blair, and the entire Anglo-American foreign policy establishment, and Donald Trump has just declared that it’s over.
This terrifies the British establishment because if America stops playing global enforcer for the rules-based order, their entire system is gonna collapse, and their 80-year run of Anglo-American imperial control is going to come to an end.
For decades, the architects of the old system have controlled the narrative.
They’ve used their media, their think tanks, their embedded agents to present their view of strategic reality, which will keep you in a world of communists versus capitalists or authoritarians versus democracy.
Get The Promethean Action FREE Newsletter at
https://www.PrometheanAction.com
Be sure to get our newsletter as well…
Russia’s Verdict: ‘Trump Gets It’ (07:02)
When you see Zelensky and the British Prime Minister making their stand on territorial integrity, you’ll understand what they’re really defending.
They’re defending a world where the global imperial elite treat every nation as a pawn on their geopolitical chessboard, and Trump just kicked it over - and Russia sees it, and they’re responding.
This is what the Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said about the new U.S. policy.
So for the first time in a decade, an American national security strategy is ready to treat Russia as a nation with legitimate interests and not a perpetual enemy.
RT was even more blunt…
How to say celebrating the end of the Anglo-American order without really saying celebrating the end of the Anglo-American order
The 2028 Trap: Targeting Vance (08:38)
Susan Kokinda continues…
Some have already accepted they can’t stop Trump right now, so they’re planning for 2028 to get someone more malleable back in power, to restore the rules-based order.
If that sounds familiar, it’s because this is exactly what the House of Lords laid out in 2018 in a foreign policy review, where they came to the conclusion that the Anglo-American special relationship might survive one term of Donald Trump, but not two.
And so you got Russiagate and COVID and what happened with the 2020 election.
They stopped a second term back then.
But Trump is back and they’re running the same playbook for 2028.
Several speakers at a recent Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) webinar identified the problem implicit in Trump’s national security strategy and they recognize that the long-term problem for them now is J.D. Vance, because they know if he becomes president, the Trump revolution continues.
Listen to Rebecca Listener, she’s a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the CFR; listen to her lose her cool over the new security strategy and over J.D. Vance.
Rebecca…
And this is really a stunning victory, I think, for the MAGA wing of the Republican Party that is represented most prominently by Vice President Vance.
It’s a sea change in U.S. foreign policy.
If you think about the trajectory, especially since the end of the Cold War, where the United States has often been working to make the world safe for democracy, to spread liberalism and liberal universalism, this is actually foreshadowing a very different turn in American foreign policy.
And one that should cause us to think about what it would mean to have the United States promoting an illiberal international order rather than a liberal international order.
And the last thing I’ll say about this is that this MAGA turn is unlikely to end with Trump.
I think it presages what advanced foreign policy might look like and what a future Republican president might do in order to use US power to make the world safer for liberalism.
Susan Kokinda…
It won’t surprise you to find out that listener not only worked in the Biden national security apparatus with responsibility for Russia in Ukraine, but she was a lead author of Biden’s national security strategy.
OUR NOTE:
Rebecca makes a significant mistake here - whether it was intentional or not, what she believes or what CFR has her trained to say is not essential
What she says about the role of the U.S. could not be further from the truth - the role of the U.S. was to interject itself into global matters at the behest of the British Empire.
She should know this as the CFR is the American counterpart to the British Chatham House (an independent policy institute based in London, founded in 1920).
The Democrat party and RINOs are known for promoting liberalism, NOT the true conservatives, nor is such even mentioned in any of our pillar documents from the Mayflower Compact to our Constitution and its Amendments.
The only thing that even comes close to what Rebecca is sharing is the two attempts to practice Socialism in Jamestown and Plymouth, both of which were abandoned within months as people started to starve.
You will see this manifesting itself as a lot of noise even now, all in the attempt to plant doubt as well as discredit Vice President Vance before he even announces his candidacy for the Office of the President.
Some of that noise may even be directed by will come from…
Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan
Condoleezza Rice
Robert Gates
Paul Ryan
and any of those who are in their close circles…
Evidence of with whom Jamie Dimon stands…
In Review
Trump has published a national security strategy that explicitly rejects 80 years of British imperial control.
Russia has publicly endorsed it
The Europeans are in a panic mode, and
The British establishment is openly strategizing about how to survive until 2028.
But the outcome isn’t predetermined.
History is being written right now, and it depends on whether Trump can maintain his political support to see this through in both 2026 and 2028.
That means protecting allies like J.D. Vance from the inevitable attacks that come from both inside and outside the MAGA movement.
And that will depend on whether enough Americans understand what’s really at stake.
This isn’t about hot-button issues or political factions - this is about whether America will finally complete our revolution or whether we will allow the British empire to reassert control.
