Use gMail? Something Else to Add to To Your Due Diligence List When It Comes To eMails
via and all rights belong to TargetLiberty.org
PREFACE: For ANY free app, the app isn’t the product: you are. Data collection is a substantial and growing business, with the global Big Data and Analytics market alone projected to be worth $274 billion by 2025 and expected to triple in size by 2030, highlighting its critical role across industries for making informed decisions. Businesses of all sizes rely on collecting vast amounts of information, from customer interactions to public records, to drive growth, improve operations, and create new revenue streams. In general, the apps collect your information and sell it to the highest bidder, plain and simple.
PAID apps will collect some data, HOWEVER are limited by contract to use it only for their product and cannot sell any information collected from their customers. Before 2014, I used both Microsoft and Google. My wife uses a different legacy brand for her email. From 2014 to 2016, I shifted our computer systems to Linux and most of the Proton products. Both come fully encrypted; Linux can be boosted to a high level of encryption if desired.
My wife is still using her legacy email; she still has problems with spam, scammers, and the like, something I do not have to be overly concerned about. Sometimes one will sneak its way in, but Proton already has it flagged as suspicious as it is not quite sure if it is spam or not.
If you have gMail, you obviously have seen some of our newsletters truncated and needed to go online to read them in full. That is due to the size limitation placed by gMAil - a limitation made necessary due to the limitations the readers gMail uses to scan ALL gMail sends. They say it is for performance issues - the truncation problem is not found in most other email services, legacy or new. You be the judge, we’re not buying it
Not saying you need to switch to what I am using, I am saying due diligence is VERY important today with technology and privacy. You do not have to be a computer geek or a nerd to check out your options, though it does help to have one on a tether if you are that inept at technology. :-) Linux is 2nd to Oracle in servers, and is growing enough in the PC market to have machines built to accommodate a pure Linux environment.
On to the reason for this post..
Gmail Bounce Scam EXPLODES—Nobody’s Safe
Scammers now weaponize Gmail’s trusted delivery failure notifications, turning a familiar system message into the most convincing phishing threat you’ll see this year.
Story Snapshot
Phishers hijack mailer-daemon bounce messages to bypass spam filters and trick users.
Scam messages appear to come from official Google addresses and closely mimic authentic notifications.
No breach detected in Gmail’s infrastructure; attacks exploit weaknesses in email protocols and user trust.
Security experts urge users to ignore suspicious bounce messages and enable multi-factor authentication.
Scammers Rewire Trust in Gmail’s System Messages
Scattered reports from late 2023 reveal an unsettling new scam targeting Gmail users: fake “Delivery Status Notification (Failure)” emails, masquerading as authentic bounce notifications from Google’s mailer-daemon.
By late 2024, these suspicious messages surged in frequency, infiltrating inboxes with uncanny precision.
The attackers’ strategy is cunning: exploit the trust placed in system-generated failures, which most users have learned to ignore or accept as routine.
Instead of generic spam, these phishing attempts wear the cloak of legitimacy, often displaying both the recipient’s and sender’s email addresses as the victim’s own, a tactic designed to bypass filters and sow confusion.
Security forums and blogs began unraveling the scam’s anatomy in August 2025.
These messages, typically sent from “mailer-daemon@googlemail.com,” mimic the format and language of genuine bounce notifications.
Embedded links and attachments, however, are malicious—engineered to harvest credentials, infect systems, or validate active email accounts for future attacks.
The platform-agnostic nature of email protocols means that while Gmail users are currently the primary targets, the technique remains viable across other services.
Attackers leverage advances in spoofing, making their messages indistinguishable from legitimate system traffic, and exploit gaps in user understanding about the difference between sender domains like @gmail.com and @google.com.
The Technical Exploit Behind the Scam
The mailer-daemon is a foundational element of email infrastructure, designed to notify senders when a message cannot be delivered.
Historically, these automated bounce messages have served as innocuous background noise in digital communication.
Sophisticated scammers now manipulate this trust, using the ability to spoof email headers and system notifications.
The scam’s effectiveness lies in its nuanced understanding of how email delivery works: by imitating the technical details of bounce messages, attackers can slip past advanced spam filters that would otherwise catch more generic phishing attempts.
No evidence points to a compromise of Gmail’s security infrastructure; instead, attackers exploit vulnerabilities inherent in standard email protocols, specifically the ease with which headers can be forged.
Earlier phishing campaigns had toyed with fake delivery failures, but the current wave is notably more convincing. Improvements in spoofing techniques and the use of actual mailer-daemon addresses make the deception nearly flawless.
As a result, users—especially those less familiar with technical nuances—are left wondering whether their accounts have been compromised, when in reality, the threat only materializes if they interact with the malicious content.
Stakeholders, Motives, and the Security Response
Gmail users find themselves at the heart of this scam, facing risks ranging from malware infection to identity theft.
Google, as the service provider, is charged with maintaining trust and security, while scammers are motivated by direct financial gain or harvesting valuable user data.
Cybersecurity experts and online forums have emerged as critical intermediaries, dissecting the scam and educating the public on safe practices.
Google’s security teams and influential bloggers have responded with advisories, urging users not to engage with suspicious bounce messages and to strengthen their defenses through multi-factor authentication.
The dynamic between technical control held by Google and the vigilance required of users highlights a persistent gap - one that scammers are eager to exploit.
Security professionals agree: mailer-daemon notifications are a normal part of email life, but their spoofing creates a unique threat vector.
While sender authentication protocols like DMARC, SPF, and DKIM offer some hope for reducing header forgery, experts stress that user education remains the most effective defense.
Forums on Reddit and Google Support document real-world examples, providing guidance on how to recognize and sidestep these scams.
Short- and Long-Term Implications for Gmail and Beyond
The immediate impact of this scam is clear - Gmail users face increased risk of malware, credential theft, and general confusion.
Over time, the erosion of trust in automated system messages poses a deeper threat, potentially undermining the reliability of email as a communication channel.
As attacks grow more sophisticated, email providers will need to continuously update filtering algorithms and user education materials to keep pace.
The broader industry feels the ripple effects, with organizations investing more in anti-phishing solutions and awareness training.
Economic costs mount as companies and individuals grapple with account recovery and malware remediation.
Social anxiety intensifies as users question the legitimacy of every automated message. Politically, the spotlight falls on tech companies to enhance security and transparency, prompting scrutiny and regulatory pressure.
Despite these challenges, cross-referenced sources confirm that Gmail’s infrastructure remains uncompromised - phishers rely on exploiting protocol weaknesses and user behavior, not on breaching Google’s systems.