Meet the Man, Clarence Thomas, and the Trials and Tribulations That Formed Who He Is Today
Justice Thomas’s Interview: : https://rumble.com/v6vh0f3-snita-hills-testimony-1991.html
In the most pivotal moment of his life, he was alone...
Discover how this Democrat-turned-conservative had everything collapsing all around him, his life filling up with regrets.
He went from asking himself while alone…
"Why am I doing this?" as there was nothing positive going on with his life
to asking himself, "For what will you die? What about your principles, the principles of this country? "
Then the lynching of the Anita Hill fiasco conjured by the Democrat-dominated Senate Hearing Committee led none other by hair-sniffing, child embracer Joe Biden and Chappaquiddick ‘survivor’ Ted Kennedy, and conducted in a manner which tried unsuccessfully to get Judge Thomas to fall into their traps that would have snared him endlessly.
The body language of Anita Hill and answer manipulation in the video was very revealing to everyone but those who wanted to take down Judge Thomas.
As was the body language of every Democrat conducting that hearing.
Clarence Thomas was the object of the Democrat Party's disdain because he was against their policies and he was not fitting into the mold they have for blacks.
He found himself awakening to the fact he was looking at the wrong people who would be problematic and shifted his focus on who truly was problematic to his principles and our country’s principles - the modern-day Liberal.
Asking the right questions is always important, not just any question about details.
Asking the right questions about perseverance, character, judgment, and discernment always expose
Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY) asked just that character-defining question of Ms Hill, making it painfully obvious he did not believe her story.
Her response was so far removed from what a woman would do after such claimed atrocities it left a crack that could not be overlooked in the balance of the hearing.
That public lynching would be the first of many such lynchings the Democrat Party would carry out publicly, culminating with President Donald J Trump. Their failure to trap many such targeted individuals was met with just as strong a character as both Thomas and Trump.
Falsified claims that suddenly surface at the most inconvenient moment - or convenient moments for the Democrats - is a trademark of their continuous and relentless pursuit to dominate the powers within government.
Thank God so many people know about it now…
All of which points to the question, have you ever noticed that the guilty are always the least affected by the actions?
Justice Thomas’s Interview: https://rumble.com/v6vh0f3-snita-hills-testimony-1991.html
If you are interested in seeing the lynching unfold and fall on its face, we have her testimony available by clicking the following button…
An unlisted video will open on our Rumble channel (feel free to share but they must have the URL to view it).
Again, with the body language, It is interesting to note the resigned stance of the Democrats during and after Justice Thomas's high-tech lynching speech. They knew they were caught and they hadn't a clue what he would do about it once on SCOTUS. Technically, Justice Thomas could only act as a witness if anyone had taken the Democrats to court on this pathetic fiasco. And at the same time, they had let the cat out of the bag that anyone they did not like would be similarly lynched. Those who were aware of this were not surprised by what happened to then presidential candidate Trump.