0:00
/
0:00

CO2 Crisis Is The Latest Money Making Machine for Globalists

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace:

"There is no definitive scientific proof... that carbon dioxide is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years.

"But there is certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that CO₂ is the building block for all life on Earth, and that without its presence in the global atmosphere... this would be a dead planet.

"Yet today, our children... are taught that CO₂ is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilisation to its knees."

Our Note

The current percentage of the atmosphere that is CO2 is 0.04%

The ideal CO2 percentage is still being debated; however, most conversations are hovering around 0.07%

And forget fossil fuels being the culprit - fossil fuels is a coined term for oil that John D Rockefeller coined to create a sense of scarcity for his production of gasoline for Standard Oil.

Fossils are found, on average, at a depth of 16,000 feet
Oil is found, on average, at a depth of 30,000 feet
So, will someone explain to me how oil is a fossil fuel?
Fossils have nothing to do with oil…

There is no scarcity of oil; only air and water exceed oil in supply.

air - 5,000,000,000,000,000,000 (quintillion) kilograms (link)

water - 332.5 million cubic miles (mi3) (link)

tapped oil - 1,650,585,140,000 gallons (link)
untapped oil - 2.1 trillion barrels, or 70 times the current global annual production rate (link)

VIDEO: Dr. Patrick Moore - Carbon and Climate Catastrophe

What Is Missing

Earth Science

Plain and simple

Our public schools used to teach this, but it was pulled by the education system in the early 1970s and has not been taught since.

Notice I said public schools - many private schools, those not dependent upon government funds, kept teaching it

OOPS

Yes, privately taught students are a small percentage of the overall student population.

But only 3% of the population is needed to form a resistance that gets people wondering and questioning.

What I have seen, so far, of what is being called Earth science is sorely lacking in many factors.

Examples, and this is of my own experience…

  • The timeline was subject to individual events as opposed to events happening globally

  • Superficial presentations as opposed to in-depth discussions of the Earth

  • Basing proof on theories and not the other way around

Thank God libraries, universities, colleges, the Library of Congress, the National Archives, and several science organizations still have the textbooks of old.

Discussion about this video