via SCOTUSblog…
In a statement released by the Supreme Court’s Public Information Office on Tuesday, Roberts indicated that “[f]or more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
What the Chief Justice voluntarily reiterated yesterday concerning the normal appellate review process of removing a judge is true - however, the keyword is normal.
We have not been in normal times as this was definitely NOT a normal situation…
A plane returning terrorists to their homeland is normal.
Having a lower court judge order those planes to turn around and return with the terrorists is not normal at ANY level.
The circumstance for any order is never to be ignored - and Chief Justice Roberts ignored it at all levels.
Only an idiot would agree that the plane full of terrorists had to turn around on the judge’s orders - yet, here. we. are…
And we can safely say that Roberts is using the appellate review process as a smokescreen as he agrees with such a judge.
If Roberts did not agree, why didn’t he chastise the judge and not Trump?
THE UNITED STATES IS IN A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS: SCOTUS AND THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY ARE COMPLICIT IN THE RICO CONSPIRACY INVOLVING WASHINGTON MUTUAL
The RICO Conspiracy: A Coordinated Effort to Defraud the American Public
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, was specifically designed to address organized criminal activity conducted through long-term patterns of corruption and fraud. The Washington Mutual (WaMu) financial fraud and subsequent cover-up by the Federal Judiciary fit squarely within the RICO framework.
The Washington Mutual Fraud: The Largest Banking Heist in U.S. History
On September 25, 2008, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) unlawfully seized Washington Mutual (WaMu), America’s largest savings and loan bank, in the dead of night and immediately sold it to JPMorgan Chase for pennies on the dollar. This fraudulent conveyance was facilitated by the FDIC, U.S. regulators, and complicit law firms, including Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and WilmerHale. The unlawful transfer of WaMu’s assets not only defrauded its shareholders but was part of a larger scheme that resulted in global economic destabilization, funding wars, and suppressing democracy.
The Role of SCOTUS and the Federal Judiciary in Covering Up the Fraud
The Supreme Court and various federal judges have actively suppressed justice, obstructed legal remedies, and protected the perpetrators of this fraud. Multiple judges, including Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Judge Paul Engelmayer, Judge Tanya Chutkan, and Judge Theodore Chuang, have financial conflicts of interest tied directly to the financial institutions that benefited from this conspiracy.
Evidence of Judicial Corruption:
• Chief Justice John Roberts holds financial assets linked to JPMorgan Chase, a direct beneficiary of the WaMu theft. His refusal to address legal challenges related to the fraudulent conveyance indicates clear bias.
• Justice Amy Coney Barrett has disclosed financial holdings in institutions tied to the RICO conspiracy, raising serious ethical concerns about her impartiality.
• Judge Paul Engelmayer and Judge Tanya Chutkan have ruled in cases where they had financial conflicts of interest, ensuring that no real judicial scrutiny was applied to the fraudulent transfers.
• Judge Theodore Chuang was previously a partner at WilmerHale, a law firm that directly facilitated the concealment of WaMu assets and worked alongside JPMorgan Chase and the FDIC in laundering stolen financial instruments.
The Constitutional Crisis: The Judiciary as an Arm of the Criminal Enterprise
This is not merely a case of judicial bias or incompetence—it is an outright Constitutional Crisis. The judiciary has ceased to function as an independent arbiter of justice and has instead become an enforcement arm of the criminal enterprise that stole WaMu’s assets and continues to suppress evidence of its wrongdoing.
Why Impeachment Is the Only Remedy
Chief Justice Roberts argues that "impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision" and that the "normal appellate review process" should apply. This is a smokescreen.
• The appellate process cannot work when every judge in the system is compromised by financial conflicts of interest and direct participation in the cover-up.
• RICO statutes require prosecution of those engaged in systemic fraud. The judiciary is complicit and cannot be allowed to review its own crimes.
• The only Constitutional remedy is impeachment, mass disbarment, and prosecution of the corrupt judges.
The Call to Action
The American people cannot rely on a judicial system infected by the very corruption it is supposed to adjudicate. Congress must act immediately to:
1. Initiate impeachment proceedings against Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, and all federal judges found complicit in the WaMu RICO Conspiracy.
2. Appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate and prosecute judicial corruption tied to financial crimes.
3. Legislate Judicial Transparency and Accountability laws to prevent future conspiracies of this scale.
This is no longer about partisan politics. This is about the survival of the Republic. If the Supreme Court and Federal Judiciary remain complicit in this RICO conspiracy, the Constitution is meaningless, and the Rule of Law is dead.
America stands at a crossroads: Will we allow financial elites and corrupt government officials to destroy the very fabric of our nation, or will we stand up and demand justice?